Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 3 Meta-analysis of the presence proportion of women cured of CIN1 disease with cold coagulation)

From: Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data

Study

 

ES

[95% Conf. Interval]

 

Javaheri (1981)

 

0.957

0.7901

0.9923

Hussein & Galloway (1985)

 

0.909

0.6226

0.9838

de Cristofaro (1990)

 

1.000

0.9162

1.0000

Rogstad (1992)

 

0.800

0.5840

0.9193

Loobuyck & Duncan (1993)

 

0.969

0.9495

0.9817

Singh (1998)

 

0.884

0.7552

0.9493

Joshi (2013)

 

0.909

0.7219

0.9747

Random pooled ES

 

0.942

0.8855

0.9715

  1. LR test: RE vs FE Model chi 2 = 4.04 (d.f. = 1) p = 0.022. Estimate of between-study variance Tau 2 = 0.4907. Test of ES = 0 : z = 45.56 p = 0.000. Output generated by the Stata procedure metaprop_one.
Back to article page

Archives of Public Health

ISSN: 2049-3258